Thursday, August 23, 2007

The CIA Truth about Kos - Daily Kos


After six months at the CIA, are you ever completely free of the taint?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Beach on MLW stated has a very interesting comment:

Here is his comment and my reply:

CIA in 2001?!? (0.00 / 0)
What WAR is He talking about?!?
September 11, 2001 (g-d awful)

October 7, 2001 bomb Afghanistan

The war in Iraq began on March 20, 2003... did the CIA know we were going to Invaded Iraq back then. Cuz, I didnt know, and if CIA did know why would they talk to him about Top Secret Shit?

"Spell check helps, dyslexia still wins"

by: Beach @ Sat Aug 25, 2007 at 05:30:21 AM PDT


[ Reply | ]
*[new] Great Point Beach!!!! (0.00 / 0)
Thats a GREAT POINT Beach...!!!
He says he interviewed in 2001 ...no one was talking about invading Iraq in 2001...it wasn't even being brought up. It would be interesting to know when he Joined the Dean campaign becasue that would be the end of the interview process and we would know when he began the interview process and if it was before September 11th.

A lot of time Moulitasa speaks fast and loose...calling himself and immigrant, coming from a family with no means, implying he saw communists kill students...then later saying he saw it on TV....

He has to be talking about the war in Iraq and it doesn't make sense and may simply be a fabrication or error of convenience on his part. Or it could mean that he has HAD CONVERSATIONS SINCE 2001 WITH THE CIA.

I don't think anyone knew except the Neo Cons after 911 that Iraq would be targeted. I don't think the CIA was in the loop on that immediately.

And he said the CIA said that they were going to war but the evidence isn't there...that's a reference to IRAQ. That issue would only have occurred from September 11 to December 31...if his account is considered accrrate.

The "evidence isn't there" concept is really coming up only in the last couple of years.

by: Stu Piddy @ Sat Aug 25, 2007 at 08:43:01 AM PDT
[ Parent | Reply ]

Tom Autopref said...

I seem to remember some early talk about Iraq from the White House in the fall of 2003. I seem to recall that the initial response from the public was "what? why Iraq?," and they backed off and replaced it with Afganistan. I don't have links though. Maybe I'm dreaming?

Francis L. Holland Blog said...

Here's what Wikipedia says about the timeline:

"Campaign timeline

* May 31, 2002 — Files paperwork to run for 2004 presidential election"

"Dean began his bid for President as a "long shot" candidate. ABC News ranked him eighth out of 12 in a list of potential presidential contenders in May of 2002. That summer, his campaign was featured as the cover article in The New Republic and in the following months he received expanded media attention. His campaign slowly gained steam, and by autumn of 2003, Dean had become the apparent frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, performing strongly in most polls and outpacing his rivals in fundraising."

If this effort is what kept MAMZ from becoming a full-time CIA agent, then he must have gotten in on the Dean thing VERY early.

Was MAMZ a paid staffer for Dean? I don't know that information. What WAS his source of income at that time?

"This is before the war, right? And se was saying, 'Man, they're going to take us to war. This isn't right."

Francis L. Holland Blog said...

OK. So, if MAMZ was at the CIA only for six months in 2001, then why were they informing him of the war in 2001?

In fact, he must have been at the CIA from 2001 until 2003!!!!!!! That's a LONG time and it would have had to include paid employment, not just interviewing.