Sunday, April 25, 2010

Banning in the Whitosphere and the 9-11 Cone of Silence

Cross-posted at "Free Speech Zone" blog.
 
Photobucket

When I follow my site meter at Truth About Kos and I discover that people are looking for information about blog participants banned at DailyKos, I realize something fundamental: Like soccer games distract Latin Americans from the fact that they barely have anything to eat and their kids can't get educated, the whole banning discussion between 2006 and 2008 distracted whitosphere bloggers and me from the fact that we were headed into a depression where ten percent of Americans and half of Black teenagers wouldn't have a job.

To his credit, there was a guy over at Dailywhitosphere who wrote almost daily about the signs that the US economy was about to go into a nosedive, but the soap opera of who would be banned and when and how distracted, just the way undercover federal agents in the Panther Party sowed distrust within the ranks until it was impossible to know whom to trust.

I feel the same distrust in the blogosphere right now, and I must admit that it includes some afrosphere participants. I am convinced that we have been infiltrated so that our discussions will be primarily about each other rather than about using computer interconnectedness as a powerful political tool.

I would go so far as to say that many blogs have been created by Government agents and/or assets to prevent the precise kind of increasing mobilization and radicalization that would have occurred in the absence of these blogs and if we were not infiltrated. Look at DailyKos and MyDD, for example.

DailyKos was opened in 2002 with a rule that participants could not and must not discuss the most important political and economic event of the decade: the professional demolition-style destruction of three enormous building in Manhattan, with a Government cover story became more incredible the more one studied the actual videos.

So, DailyKos opens less than a year later, and it's most known in the blogosphere for its insistence that we must not discuss what was obviously a conspiracy involving many different parties in a "false flag" covert action that can only be described as treason, unless you can accept the utter destruction of three commercial buildings, the destruction of three passenger jets and deaths of thousands of people as a day in the life of the Federal Government.

The primary blogs of the whitosphere were not created as a place for leftists to discuss reality; they were created to divide intelligent leftists from those who might otherwise listen to cogent arguments, watch first-hand films, and conclude the that president of the United States and/or the vice-president were so determined to take military neck-hold on America's foreign and domestic policy that the CIA permitted and encouraged the destruction of buildings so that voters and political activists would become more supine in the face of a massive tragedy that leftists were not allowed to discuss.


Although I admit that I haven't read the blog 9-11 False Flag blog, the banner of the blog summarizes what I believe about 9-11, particularly after viewing videos of the buildings imploding as well as the spontaneous expressions of disbelief among first responders: "The Bush Regine Engineered 9-11." I prefer to see the proposition described this way, ("The Bush Regine Engineered 9-11.") because I am not even convinced that the President knew fully what would happen on 9-11.

There were battles within the Administration of who would control the Armed Forces and intelligence apparatus in the Bush Administrations and what the scope of their authority would be. The events of 9-11 resolved that question of authority completely, with Dick Cheney and his lieutenants in charge of the military response to 9-11 as well as the propaganda that would justify the military response, because 9-11 in and of itself would not have been enough to convince the nation that Cheney should be allowed to do as he pleased in domestic suppression of dissent and undertakings of foreign wars.

An argument had to be made that the destruction of the towers in combination with the ongoing threat meant that Dick Cheney should be in control of the response to domestic terrorism and foreign terrorism, with terrorism coming to signify whatever Dick Cheney wanted it to signify. The whitosphere has been an active if covert participant in this propaganda of compelled omission. And who better to ride herd than the man who was born on September 11th, 1971 and was trained at the CIA beginning in 2001; Markos C[?] Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga (MAMZ).

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Some Participants at Free Speech Zone Are Simply Idiotic!

So far, I have not been banned from posting at the whitosphere's Free Speech Zone (FSZ).  However, I have had a number of sadistic comments submitted after my posts at FSZ about issues very personal to me. I find FSZ to be far too much like Dailywhitosphere (which ought to be no surprise me or anyone else, because (I have heard somewhere) it was started by people from DailyKos).  Certainly a lot of screennames I saw at DailyKos are also present at FSZ.

There are far too many people at FSZ whom I first met at DailyKos (because they visited my posts to make idiotic and facially nasty comments).  They have not changed.  Rather than discuss the issues at hand, they make personal attacks, in an attempt to derail the discussion of the subject matter.

Although I still enjoy updating the Truth About Kos blog, when some new facet of the truth comes across my desktop, I've realized the futility of arguing with idiots and haven't the patience for it.  It's true that the more that people hate me and post negative comments, the more other people are drawn to my ideas to see what all the fuss is about.  And so CIA-trained haters (if that's what they are) can actually be quite useful to determined writer with information to which he seeks to bring attention.

For instance, any link posted at DailyWhitosphere and leading to the Truth About Kos is bound to draw forty (or less) MAMZ minions, to the comment or post, which minions defend MAMZ's participation in the CIA, defend his letter opposing ALL gay service in the military, and insist that MAMZ cannot be gay because he is married, like ex-Senator Larry Craig.
"Why would you have your wife hauled out before the media when you're sitting there explaining your latest indiscretion? Because a picture is worth 1,000 words," Cathy Allen, spokeswoman for the American Association of Political Consultants, told ABCNEWS.com.


"If you see a guy standing next to his wife, it offers some explanation that he might be telling the truth. It means 'how can he be gay? He's got a wife.' … Usually, there is an assumption that if your wife can forgive you, then the world can forgive you," she said.  ABCNews

One again, the only reason I have to believe that MAMZ might be gay is the letter he wrote in 1993 to his school newspaper.  I don't care if MAMZ is gay, except to the extent that it will tell us whether he is a homophobic homosexual hypocrite or not.

This post really is not about MAMZ, but it's about his direct and indirect associates at FSZ.  I just don't have the patience to argue silliness with people who couldn't care less about substance.  In the bible it warns that if you argue in public with idiots, passersby may be confused about which of the arguers is the idiot.

For this reason, and much to the pleasure of the people who make the most idiotic comments, I don't think I'll cross-post at FSZ anymore, and if I do I will refrain from reading the comments (positive and negative).  It's just too much of a waste of my time when I've found other more fruitful writing projects that are far less trying.

There was a day when an author published a book and then lived or emotionally died, perhaps, based on the literary commentary.  I confess that I have yet to read the book about President Obama's election campaign, because some (white-skinned) reviewer commented negatively on it.  Now reviews are immediate from a much larger audience, but the effect is the same:  A bunch of 98% white people, many of whom may be blogging professionally for the federal government, tell you whether they believe your post is meaningful or not.

Before I waste my time on that, I think I'll call El Salvador and ask as many people as necessary to tell me the exact familial relationship between Markos C[arlos?] Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga (MAMZ) and Eduardo Carlos Alberto Delgado Zúñiga.  At least doing the latter would be research time well-spent, while arguing with idiots is something any idiot can do.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

FBI FOIA Request about DailyKos Unavailing

PhotobucketOut of curiosity, I filed a Freedom of Information Act request about DailyKos with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I am beginning to think that the term "main file records" means a lot more than it appears to say facially. If there is nothing among "main file records," I would certainly also be interested in information that was contained in a non-main file record.

Photobucket

I have a feeling that looking into "main file records" but not others is somehow like looking for waves in the sand but not in the water. 'We were unable to find any engine troubles whatsoever in the trunk of your car.'

Photobucket

Marcus Baram at Huffington Post encountered a similarly odd response to his request for FBI records about J.D. Salinger. J.D. Salinger Didn't Have An FBI File?

The Huffington Post recently received a disappointing reply to a FOIA request for any files or records on Salinger, who died at the end of January. According to the FBI, the bureau was unable to identify "responsive main file records" under the name Jerome David Salinger. (Salinger's name may still pop up in other files kept by the bureau and a request for cross-references is still pending.)
I don't know, but I have a suspicion that "main file records" are defined so narrowly that even the unibomber would have no "main file records" but he might have reams of 'derivative file records(?), or something of the sort. Anyway, here's how the Justice Department responded to my request about DailyKos. One would think that a crash-the-gates leftist advocacy and money bundling group would have at least one document in its "main record files."

This is the FBI's response:

MAMZ,Kos,DailyKos,CIA,FBI

Maybe I'll file an appeal, requesting FBI records about DailyKos that are not in the main records files, but that are in cross-reference files or others interesting places.

Francis L. Holland imagines:
Dear Atty. Holland: Although there are sixty-eight thousand hits for "CIA" + "Moulitsas" in Google, there is not a single reference to that person FBI "main file records." 
In fact, our records contain no information at all on the existence of a blog called "DailyKos" or a man named "Markos C. Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga."  It is possible that we are denying records because he is a CIA agent and that is one of the circumstances under which always deny having any information, as a national security exception to FOIA principles.  You can't have MAMZ's FBI records and "You do not have permission to view this diary."
Have a nice day.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

MAMZ, DailyKos Financially Supported Homosex-Addict Ex-Rep Eric Massa

The difference between being a homosexual and being a homosex-addict is playing itself out in the political ruin of ex-representative Eric Massa. The issue is also embarrassing one of his best-known whitosphere supporters, Markos C. Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga (known to many as "MAMZ," the owner of the DailyKos blog).

As the Washington Post reports:

Massa's decline from first-term Democratic congressman to former lawmaker embroiled in an alleged sex scandal occurred in just 14 months. Democrats had celebrated his arrival after he seized a Republican-held seat, but that ended shortly after House ethics investigators began pressing his employees to explain what exact terms he used with them and the specific circumstances in which he touched them. WaPost

MAMZ and his supporters have often expressed the belief that being an military veteran (like Massa and MAMZ) inoculates candidates against charges of lack of patriotism, lack of military "strength" and lack of manliness. Massa is a twenty-year veteran of the US Navy.

So, MAMZ and many participants at his DailyKos blog rallied to strongly support and contribute financially to the now completely discredited ex-Rep. Eric Massa. They were so convinced by Massa's portfolio that MAMZ and DailyKos participants bundled money for Massa in both his unsuccessful 2006 campaign and again in 2008, according to MAMZ himself:

. . . it made sense to pool our communities in order to maximize what we could raise for individual candidates.

And on that front, we were effective. In 2006, we raised $1.54 million for 18 candidates . . .
Several others came so close, that they're back this year to finish the job, such as Darcy Burner, Eric Massa, Gary Trauner and Dan Seals. Introducing the Orange To Blue list bykos, Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 01:00:19 PM PDT

MAMZ's support for Massa through two election cycles warns us

(1) against MAMZ's political judgment because even his winning candidates can turn out to be sour disappointments and unimaginably embarrassing, and

(2) his part in this episode tells us something crucially important about MAMZ's relationship to his own sexuality.

Ironically, MAMZ once wrote that, in general, soldiers like homosex-addict Massa were precisely the kind of soldiers that MAMZ himself was desperately afraid of when MAMZ was in the US Army, "serving courageously" in Germany during the first Gulf War.

As a veteran, MAMZ wrote:

Worrying about whether the known homosexual sleeping next to you is watching as you change your underwear may seem trivial as you read this, but to the soldier who's short-tempered after three weeks in the field and four hours of daily sleep, it becomes a matter of great importance to his pride and sensibilities. Truth About Kos cites letter from Northern Illinois University "Northern Star" archives.

For some reason, supporting the sexually abusive Massa never aroused MAMZ's "sensibilities" in 2006 through 2008. (I don't care if MAMZ is gay, except to the extent that the above letter shows him to be a homosexual homophobic hypocrite who fights gay rights as a political posture while sharing gay's sexual preference in the private sanctum of his own closet. MAMZ invites doubts about his sexuality, even by signing his letter to the editor, "Marcos C. A. Moulitsas: Undecided Freshman."

In spite of being married, as is MAMZ, and in spite of having a long 20-year military career--Massa turns out to be just the type of sex-crazed homosexual who MAMZ says he so feared. Although some comments say that MAMZ can't be gay, in spite of the indications to the contrary in his letter, the Massa case reminds us that even married men can be gay.

francislholland :: MAMZ, DailyKos Financially Supported Homosex-Addict Ex-Rep Eric Massa It seems to me that Massa, in addition to being homosexual, as many people are, also is a homosex-addict and lust addict, who could not and would not contain his overtly sexually abusive behavior before it led to the loss of his seat in the US House of Representatives, embarrassing all who supported him.

Was Eric Massa an unacknowledged homosex-addict during his twenty years in the US Navy? I don't know the answer to that question, although I suspect readers will have stiff opinions on the subject. Even during his Navy service, the New York Daily News reports that:
former shipmates emerged last week with stories that Massa tried to grope, "snorkel" and ogle those of lesser rank.

The NY DailyNews even reports that the Massa case is undercutting the move toward freely gay service in the military. Yet, the Massa implosion is no more an argument against gays in the military than the rapes of women in the military is an argument for an all-female military. It's true that an all-female military would reduce heterosexual rapes and remarks, but the disadvantages of such a proposition are obviously too high--and too broadly discriminatory--for the proposition to be seriously considered.

MAMZ opposed gays in the military and then supported a gay Congressional candidate who was known to make inappropriate sexual advances. Once again, I don't think CIA-trained MAMZ is the right man to choose the candidates of the Democratic Party.

MAMZ, DailyKos Financially Supported Homosex-Addict Ex-Rep Erica Massa

The difference between being a homosexual and being a homosex-addict is playing itself out in the political ruin of ex-representative Eric Massa. The issue is also embarrassing one of his best-known whitosphere supporters, Markos C. Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga (known to many as "MAMZ," the owner of the DailyKos blog).

As the Washington Post reports:
Massa's decline from first-term Democratic congressman to former lawmaker embroiled in an alleged sex scandal occurred in just 14 months. Democrats had celebrated his arrival after he seized a Republican-held seat, but that ended shortly after House ethics investigators began pressing his employees to explain what exact terms he used with them and the specific circumstances in which he touched them. WaPost
MAMZ and his supporters have often expressed the belief that being an military veteran (like Massa and MAMZ) inoculates candidates against charges of lack of patriotism, lack of military "strength" and lack of manliness. Massa is a twenty-year veteran of the US Navy.

So, MAMZ and many participants at his DailyKos blog rallied to strongly support and contribute financially to the now completely discredited ex-Rep. Eric Massa. They were so convinced by Massa's portfolio that MAMZ and DailyKos participants bundled money for Massa in both his unsuccessful 2006 campaign and again in 2008, according to MAMZ himself:
. . . it made sense to pool our communities in order to maximize what we could raise for individual candidates.

And on that front, we were effective. In 2006, we raised $1.54 million for 18 candidates . . . Several others came so close, that they're back this year to finish the job, such as Darcy Burner, Eric Massa, Gary Trauner and Dan Seals.

Introducing the Orange To Blue list

Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 01:00:19 PM PDT

MAMZ's support for Massa through two election cycles warns us (1) against MAMZ's political judgment because even his winning candidates turn out to be sour disappointments, and (2) tells us something crucially important about MAMZ's relationship to his own sexuality.

Ironically, MAMZ once wrote that, in general, soldiers like homosex-addict Massa were precisely the kind that MAMZ himself was desperately afraid of encountering when MAMZ was in the US Army, serving courageously in Germany during the first Gulf War.

As a veteran, MAMZ wrote:
Worrying about whether the known homosexual sleeping next to you is watching as you change your underwear may seem trivial as you read this, but to the soldier who's short-tempered after three weeks in the field and four hours of daily sleep, it becomes a matter of great importance to his pride and sensibilities. Truth About Kos cites letter from Northern Illinois University "Northern Star" archives.
For some reason, supporting the sexually abusive Massa never aroused MAMZ's "sensibilities" in 2006 through 2008. In spite of being married, as is MAMZ, and in spite of having a long 20-year military career--Massa turns out to be just the type of sex-crazed homosexual who MAMZ says he so feared.

It seems to me that Massa, in addition to being homosexual, as many people are, also is a homosex-addict and lust addict, who could not and would not contain his overtly sexually abusive behavior before it led to the loss of his seat in the US House of Representatives, embarrassing all who supported him.

Was Eric Massa an unacknowledged homosex-addict during his twenty years in the US Navy? I don't know the answer to that question, although I suspect readers will have stiff opinions on the subject. Even during his Navy service, the New York Daily News reports that:
former shipmates emerged last week with stories that Massa tried to grope, "snorkel" and ogle those of lesser rank.
The NY DailyNews even reports that the Massa case is undercutting the move toward freely gay service in the military. Yet, the Massa implosion is no more an argument against gays in the military than the rapes of women in the military is an argument for an all-female military. It's true that an all-female military would reduce heterosexual rapes and remarks, but the disadvantages of such a proposition are obviously too high--and too broadly discriminatory--for the proposition to be seriously considered.

MAMZ opposed gays in the military and then supported a gay Congressional candidate who was known to make inappropriate sexual advances. Once again, I don't think CIA-trained MAMZ is the right man to choose the candidates of the Democratic Party.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Free Speech Zone Diary and Comments Weigh "Truth About Kos."

I don't usually print rumors, but some rumors--like the rumors that John Edwards was having an affair--turn out to be true and politically significant. So, I'm going to print this excerpt from a discussion over at "The Free Speech Zone" blog, in which "Revisionist" contributed the following:

The rumour is (0.00 / 0)
that MAMZ was working for a Gay Porn company between him somehow not being able to find a job with his JD from a top school and starting DK. He wasnt a performer.

I keep harping on the JD. i know several people who I dont think are as sharp as a spoon who got thru law school with Cs and who had no issue finding well paying employment. I can believe MAMZ was that desparate in a city the size of SF. especially with the alumni of his school.

Funny too how one of the big wigs at that college was also heavily involved in intrique surrounding the country MAMZ parents fled. I wish I could access all the facts but they vanished with PFF. God and I remeber the exact thread all the Jesuit shit came up in.


[ Parent ]
yeah yeah (5.00 / 1)
It's that simple

The question FLH was raising during his exposes was when exactly did MAMZ have his conversions. MAMZ was from a conservative oligarcal family, campaigned for Republicans, was anti-abortion, voted for Bush I, was anti-gay etc. He was a ditto head. There is no record of transformation. He suddenly shows up in SanFran and claims he cant find a job. Even though he has a JD from a Jesuit run college connected to the FBI/CIA. The kind of college that likes to place its students. Even Delaware Dumbfuck was bale to get a job handling traffic tickets.

If you follow the MAMZ narrative, regardless of his beliefs, there are weird inconsistancies about where MAMZ lived when. When he was in Chicago and when he was supposably in DC. Was in DC because of his family?


To be more specific (5.00 / 1)
My own empirical experience doesnt make me think that people go thru some kind of 180 philosophical catharisis there last couple of years of college. My friends who were conservative republicans are conservative republicans 20 years later. The liberals are still liberals. Some of the libs get a little fuddy duddy when after they have kids but not much.

Only exceptions are people from bumfuck podunck towns who had 0 experience with anything outside of a narrow world view forced on them by their remote locations. This cant be the case with MAMZ since he sez he grew up in Chicago and DC. Plus they usually go thru their converstions really quick their freshman year when they get exposed to negros and queers and freaks for the first time.


[ Parent ]
Revisionist made reference to a screenshot of the homophobic sexually confused letter and cited Truth About Kos as the blog that researched all of MAMZ's college writings and posted the interesting (shocking) letters for everyone to judge for themselves.

As others in this thread said, it's certainly possible and even common for a sexually confused 22 year old to try to establish his own questionable heterosexuality by engaging in gay bashing. And yet a study cited elsewhere at this blog points out that men whose opinions are most homophobic are also men whose penises show the most engorgement while watching men have sex with each other. Read the original virulently homophobic letter that MAMZ wrote and published in his college newspaper and decide for yourself!

In fact, you can read ALL of his student newspaper articles at this link, and decide for yourselves which of his articles make MAMZ look most like a hypocritical callous Republican who was burnishing his resume for political office, even to the extent of denying being a minority when his last name is Zúñiga, until his homophobic screed and his CIA contacts became common knowledge to opposition researchers.

Here's a clue, MAMZ: Your money bundling and CIA contacts might get you into the mainstream media and Democratic Party circles, but your right-wing background is far to curious, scandalous, offensively outrageous and salacious to go unnoticed should you ever run for public office or seek an office that requires confirmation. People are going to compare what you've said about yourself to what can be proved (and disproved) by public documents and your own inconsistent (utterly contradictory) statements.

If you think you've been "Kos-bashed" in the blogosphere, just wait until you have a well-financed Republican opponent with a crack opposition research time. In the public eye, your lies and the truth will clash like rams butting their horns against each other, and the public beyond the blogging circles will have their first taste of you when your homophobia and CIA ties become common knowledge. They'll also want to know how a liberal from a humble background in El Salvador (but born in Chicago) nonetheless has family members that get million dollar loan guarantees from the US Federal Government's Overseas Private Investment Council. The more voters look at you, the more they'll see an over-privileged upper-crust CIA brat, with a strange attraction to writing about his fear of gays.

You won't be able to raise money among gays, having called them "inherently uncomfortable." You won't be able to raise money among Latinos, having denied being a Latino yourself (see above).

Markos Moulitsas, Northern Star, Northern Illinois University "(NIU) student newspaper:

"And as I left the ugly reality of racism behind, it struck me that what was such an easy and trivial exercise for me would be impossible for anyone whose skin color or religious persuassion (sic) made them the target of bigotry and discrimination. They would never be able to escape who they were." (Emphasis added.)
If you call Latinos and Hispanics "they" and turn your back on them in "escape" from their color-and-ethnicity-aroused plight, you certainly cannot now run for office on the "I'm a Latino plank", particularly since only one percent of DailyKos readers are Latino. You must think Latinos are stupid! In fact, they don't read your blog because they sense intuitively that you're a fake, and your blog virtually never addresses issues relevant to Latinos, from a Latino perspective.

Blacks are only 2% of DailyKos' reading audience, so you'd have to run in a district that has few or no Blacks. Retired and present military people won't support you because (a) your an atheist, and (b) you try to convince people that you served in the Gulf War, when you spent the whole time in Germany and training on a base in the United States.

You want to run from a liberal leftist district? That district (somewhere in Vermont?) would have to forgive you for calling the CIA a "very liberal institution." In other words, you should run for office in El Salvador, where the man who runs your "family hotel" is also president of the national tourism board, and where right-wing oligarchs often become elected politicians by literally slaughtering their political opponents.