Why Does Democratic Luntz Want to Be Banned At DailyKos?

DemocraticLuntz has been around at DailyKos for quite some time, over two years, so why has he decided now that he wants to be banned from participation there? He must know that linking to anything I've written is considered to be treasonous by the DailyKos minions whose job is to keep negative information about Kos from being disseminated among the DailyKos faithful.

I keep an eye on my SiteMeter for this blog to find out who has gotten the news from The Truth About Kos blog that Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga (MAMZ) spent two years training at the CIA (listen to the audiotape of him confessing), and also wrote an outrageously homophobic rant for his college newspaper back in 1993.

Today, I've received sixty-seven hits and more coming directly from a link in an article at DailyKos, and I know why. A poster by the name of DemocraticLuntz (bless his heart, at least for today) has linked to my extremely well-known article entitled, "The Indictment of Markos C.A. Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA by Justice and History (Updated with Additional Information and Counts)".

Because of that article, and links to it from over sixty blogs, everyone who has ever Googled "Moulitsas" and "CIA" together (over 31,000 hits) knows that Moulitsas spent two years training at the CIA at the same time he was starting DailyKos. (Again, you'll find the link to his audio-taped admission in the sidebar here.) And they've read his homophobic rant from when, as he acknowledged at DailyKos, he was an "asshole".

Even before I started this blog, I had become notorious at DailyKos, because my articles regularly drew between 150 and as many as 400 comments. In a meritocracy, I would have been hired as a writer rather than banned. But, I gored Al Gore for his reliance on the white male supremacy paradigm as the key to his success, and I made John Edwards look like the very same liar and manipulator that his own recent behavior has proven him to be. Everyone hated me for goring their favorite politicians, but it was necessary.

I predicted in 2006 that the end of the 43-term white male monopoly of the presidency would come in 2008, and I was determined to do everything in my power to make sure we DID end the white male monopoly of the presidency in 2008 . People at DailyKos did not see that as a worthy goal, because they thought it quite natural that EVERY president of the United Staates be a white man.

I was "controversial" in my arguments, according to TheAmericanProspect.Com. I was also prophetic, but DailyKos is not the place for prophets. It's a field of sheep where CIA-trained MAMZ is the sheepherder.

Everyone at DailyKos hated me for predicting that the43-term white male monopoly of the presidency would end in 2008, because they all had wet panties or a hard-on for some white male candidate, like Al Gore, John Edwards, Mark Warner . . . Anyone as long as he was a "realistically electable" white man.

Instead of admitting that what I said was prophetic, they called me a "racist" and a "monkey" and then banned my participation there. It just shows how much they know. I predicted the end of the 43-term white male monopoly of the presidency as early as 2006, just before I was banned from participation at DailyKos.

Since I hate Markos Moulitsas (I hate all infiltrators and agent provocateurs of progressive movements) I think DemocraticLuntz over at DailyKos must not want to participate their anymore, he must know that linking to anything I say is considered treasonous over there, particularly when I have focused my forty-five caliber research and writing on Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúniga himself.

(What does the "C. A." in Markos C.A. Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA's name stand for, and why can't we find out just by reading Moulitsas' Wikipedia.org or SourceWatch.org pages? I believe it's because there are some DEEP DARK secrets hidden behind those middle initials. Perhaps MAMZ has those initials because he was named after his uncle (?), Carlos Alberto Delgado Zúñiga, the “family” member listed in government records as “manager” of the Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA’s "family hotel", who is also president of the “Junta Directiva” of the CÁMARA SALVADOREÑA DE TURISMO (CASATUR), the national tourism board of El Salvador, according to El Salvador's "La Prensa" newspaper.) The same uncle (?) who own Baja Salt Group, the sole Central and South American distributor for a Mexican table and industrial salt corporation, E.S.S.A.

That's too much information for anyone at DailyKos to know about their "progressive" "leftist" leader. Who will believe that MAMZ is a progressive when they learn that his uncle (?) is one of the most influential hotel conglomerate and salt wholesalers in Latin America? Who will believe MAMZ is "progressive" when they learn that his uncle (?) is an integral member of a ANEP, which the CIA has called a right-wing "pressure group"? It's all in the Indictment.

Everyone who has participated at DailyKos for more than a month knows that linking to anything I have written is considered per se cause for being hounded and harrassed and banned from DailyKos. I am so persona non grata over there that you can only mention my name derisively, but certainly not as the source for original extensively researched and linked damning information proving that MAMZ has lied up and down about his personal and family background and that he is therefore most likely a CIA agent or asset.

After you read the links in the Indictment, what more do you need to conclude that MAMZ must be a CIA agent or asset? Do you want him to brand "CIA" on his own forehead before you will accept that he meant what he said when he said, "I would have no problem working for the CIA today"?

I don't usually read DailyKos, but I think I'll go read the comments to DemocraticLuntz's article, (unless it's been taken down already), so I can see how many DailyKos participants insist that they have friends in the CIA and being a CIA agent really isn't so bad. You know what? I don't have any friends in the CIA and I don't want any. I feel the same way about CIA agents that Markos C. A. Moulitsas Zúñiga feels about homosexuals.

UPDATE: Look for ZiggyDove to be banned at DailyKos as well. I thought the 500+ comments on DemocraticLuntz article were a complete and very intentional waste of time. (Inane and off-topic comments is how the MAMZ minions at DailyKos tell and warn other readers not to take a serious article seriously.) Just when I thought there were 500 intentionally childish and inane comments, I read this from ZiggyDove:

Free Speech (0+ / 0-)

Free speech is always a problem on many different levels. But free speech is just what it is. Either you understand the concept or you don't. I have problems with the 'Anne Frank' label. How dare anyone use her name as a handle or anything else? But free speech allows this. Kos apparently has problems with free speech as it relates to 911 & that's a real limitation now in terms of any discussion about torture and those confessions that were the basis of the 911 commission. This one example indicates the problems with any restriction of free speech. You have to have some faith that the sledge will go over the damn and that most people, given time, will realize the reality of any situation. And the ability to promote freedom of speech, which is really freedom of knowledge, will promote a better understanding for our society as a whole. ZiggyDove

Well, Ziggy, you've made good use of your last posting privileges at DailyKos. Anyone who strongly defends those who have been banned is going to be banned on the spot. So, those who don't want to be banned will follow the lead of the MAMZ minions and say something utterly off-topic and inane rather than address the substantive issue that DemocraticLuntz raises in his article today.

Transcript of Markos C.A.Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA's June 6, 2006 Speech to Commonwealth Club, Confessing to Two Years "Training" at the CIA While Starting DK

Note: I first published this article at MyLeftWing, before StuPiddy pointed out, based on my timeline, that Markos Moulitsas MUST have spent as much as two years at the CIA, based on his confession in his speech to the Commonwealth Club on June 6, 2006.

Markos Moulitsas (DailyKos) Spent Six Months Working at the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) "As an organization their heart is in the right place. I've never had any problem with the CIA." -- Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, June 2, 2006. Hat Tip to Stu Piddy, and cross-posted at the Francis L. Holland Blog. Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, owner of the DailyKos website, now admits that he spent six months in the employ of the US Central Intelligence Agency in 2001. In a one-hour interview on June 2, 2006 interview at the Commonwealth Club, Moulitsas, also known as "Kos," admitted that he was a CIA employee and would have "no problem working for them" in the present: QUESTION: Not long ago, liberals loathed the Central Intelligence Agency as the enemy of democratic governments and they installed dictators around the world, and these days you read the papers and people on the Left are rallying to the defense of the CIA and are indignant when the CIA is politicized. How did this come about, that suddenly liberals are championing the CIA: MARKOS' ANSWER: I don't know. You know I. QUESTION: Do you find it stranger or ironic, this sudden love for the CIA? MARKOS' ANSWER: You know . . . coughs . . . I think a lot of the people that didhave problems with the CIA, I mean it was a very vocal minority. [CONTINUED BELOW]

francislholland :: Markos Moulitsas Admits WANTING TO Work for the CIA

MARKOS' ANSWER: You know . . . coughs . . . I think a lot of the people that didhave problems with the CIA, I mean it was a very vocal minority. I think most people really didn't think about it all that much. Right? It wasn't really on their radar screens, ah, in the way that now it is, because now we are in this huge war, and it was the CIA that was warning the Administration against invading because, there were no weapons of mass destruction. Here's a little secret I don't think I've ever written about: But in 2001, I was unemployed, underemployed, unemployed. You know I was in that . . You all have been there "dot com" people? Kinda like, in between jobs, doin' a little contract work and . . . kinda. So, you know. That's where I was: in this really horrible netherworld of 'will I make rent next month' and . . . So, I applied to the CIA and I went all the way to the end, I mean it was to the point where I was going to sign papers to become Clandestine Services. And it was at that point that the Howard Dean campaign took off and I had to make a decision whether I was gonna kinda join the Howard Dean campaign, that whole process, or was I was going to become a spy. (Laughter in the audience.) It was going to be a tough decision at first, but then the CIA insisted that if, if I joined that, they'd want me to do the first duty assignment in Washington, DC, and I hate Washington, DC. Six years in Washington, DC [inaudible] that makes the decision a lot easier. [ . . .] This is a very liberal institution. And in a lot of ways, it really does attract people who want to make a better, you know, want to make the world a better place . . . Of course, they've got their Dirty Ops and this and that, right but as an institution itself the CIA is really interested in stable world. That's what they're interested in. And stable worlds aren't created by destabilizing regimes and creating wars. Their done so by other means. Assassination labor leaders . . . I'm kidding! [ . . . ] I don't think it's a very partisan thing to want a stable world. And even if you're protecting American interests, I mean that can get ugly at times, but generally speaking I think their hearts in the right place. As an organization their heart is in the right place. I've never had any problem with the CIA. I'd have no problem working for them . . * * * * * I feared something like this was coming. I warned America back on June 2, 2006 that Markos Moulitsas was "an exquisite little crank," but I remained extremely concerned that he might not be utterly discredited before he was able to steer the Democrats' presidential nomination in 2008. That's why I started the blog called "The Truth About Markos" in which I said, in an article entitled "The Rehabilitation of Markos Moulitsas," Today, Markos Moulitsas, is the doctrinaire leftist publisher of the DailyKos "progressive" anti-war blog, railing against the moderation of candidates like Hillary Rodham Clinton and Harold Ford. But in the 1980's, Mr. Moulitsas was an unabashed Reagan Democrat, even working as a campaign aid to George H.W. Bush in the 1992 Presidential election. WASHINGTON MONTHLY FRANCIS L. HOLLAND BLOG Last year, in a piece Markos wrote for the Cato (libertarian) Institute, Markos acknowledged that the spent the 1980's as a Reagan Republican. MARKOS' CATO ARTICLE, Yes, "Progessive" Markos of DailyKos was a Reagan Republican!!!!!!!! How did Markos achieve this stunning metamorphosis in just a few short years? Actually, nobody knows and Markos isn't telling. He has told interviewers, improbably, that he last voted for the Republicans in 1992, because he suddenly realized that they didn't support "states rights" as strongly as he would have liked. Now, I need no longer worry. Democrats will no longer listen to Markos Moulitsas unless they want their presidential candidate to be chosen by an agent of the Central Intelligence Agency. But there is so much to say about this. I was banned from participation in MyDD and notified in writing that the banning was because I violated the unspoken rule against criticizing Markos Moulitsas. But I insisted at DailyKos and MyDD that I would prefer to be banned for criticizing someone like Markos than to be ashamed later for having failed to criticize him. There's another lesson to be learned here. Black people are the Left's "canary in the coal-mine." If you find that you are part of "progressive organization" that has no Black people, you should ask yourself if, perhaps, Black people have legitimate and fundamentally ethical reasons why they refuse to participate, or why we critize. In this case, the reason is that Markos Moulitsas is a Reaganite ex-CIA operative in training. We intuitively do not trust people like that to lead progressive movements. Each of us in the progressive movement has an obligation to keep his/her eyes open and ward against government and other covert attempts to to destroy or divert our movement. I have criticized and warned the public about Markos Moulitsas because I believe he represents precisely that sort of threat of covert subversion. With the news that Markos was a CIA employee, I feel I have been vindicated and that the role of of the Afrosphere and the historical role of Blacks as the vanguard of the Left has been vindicated.

Poll

Can Markos Moulitsas be trusted?

Yes Maybe No Hell, no!

Results

Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga Refuses to Refute CIA Connections

For almost two years the Truth About Kos has disseminated the information that Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga, according to his own words, was trained (and/or worked) at the CIA between 2001 and 2003. And yet, over the last two years, while Google has amassed over 26,000 hits connecting the search terms "Moulitsas" and "CIA", still Moulitsas Zúñiga has never come forward to deny or explain his contacts with the CIA.

He did, however, come forward and acknowledge other information gathered by the Truth About Kos Blog, e.g. that he was a Republican for most of his life before starting DailyKos, and that he wrote a college newspaper opinion piece in which he vigorously opposed ALL gay service in the military.

The Indictment of Markos C.A. Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA by Justice and History (Updated with Additional Information and Counts)

So, why doesn't Moulitsas Zúñiga come forward to deny or explain the other facts at Truth About Kos, e.g. the amazing wealth, influence and right-wing politics of his family in El Salvador? Does he think the public and the media will just not notice the 26,000 hits at Google referring to these facts? Or is he afraid to comment because to do so will just bring more attention to truths that he cannot possibly refute?

More Information About Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga

Somebody has to add some real information to the Wikipedia.org biography of Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga and it seems it is being done, a little bit at a time. (Right) now, there is a lot to be learned at his Wikipedia biography, if you read between the lines of propaganda.

Markos Moulitsas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Spanish name; the first family name is Moulitsas and the second is Zúñiga.

Markos Moulitsas Zúñiga
Markos "Kos" Moulitsas
Born	Markos Moulitsas Zúniga 11 October 1971 (age 37) Chicago, Illinois
Residence	Berkeley, California
Other names	Kos
Occupation	Blogger
Known for	Political activism, blogging
Religious beliefs	Atheist [1]
Website http://dailykos.com/

Although he has at times claimed in newspaper interviews to be an immigrant to the United States, Markos C. A. Moulitsas Zúñiga was born in Chicago on 11 October 1971. He is often known by his username and former military moniker "Kos" (kōz), is the founder and main author of Daily Kos, a weblog focusing on liberal and Democratic Party politics. He is also a weekly columnist at the Washington D.C. newspaper The Hill and a contributing columnist atNewsweek.

Moulitsas currently resides in Berkeley, California, with his wife and two children.

Contents [hide] 1 Early life 2 Daily Kos 2.1 Growth and controversy 2.2 Electoral successes 3 Consultant, author, and entrepreneur 4 References 5 External links

[edit]Early life

Moulitsas in the U.S. Army

Markos C. A. Moulitsas Zúñiga was born in Chicago, Illinois to a Salvadoran mother and Greek father, and grew up in El Salvador. (Following the Spanish language custom for surnames, his most important surname is "Moulitsas", instead of "Zúñiga".) It is not know what his middle initials "C. A." stand for, although he used them to sign at least one opinion piece that he submitted to his college newspaper, the Northern Star.

His family moved back to the United States in 1980 due to the Salvadoran civil war. After graduating fromSchaumburg High School^[2] , he served in the U.S. Army from 1989 through 1992; while stationed in Germany, and after missing deployment to the Gulf War "by a hair",^[3] he changed his political affiliation from the Republican to the Democratic Party. He has described the American military as "perhaps the ideal society – we worked hard but the Army took care of us in return."^[3]

After leaving the army, he attended Northern Illinois University and wrote for (and eventually managed) the Northern Star college newspaper.^[4] According to Sourcewatch.org., one of the articles he wrote vehemently opposed all gay service in the military and screenshots of that article are available at various blogs on the Web.

On August 30, 2007, when confronted in comments at DailyKos about that 1993 college newspaper article in which he opposed all gay service in the military, Markos C. A. Moulitsas Zúñiga responded in comments at his blog, saying, "I haven't hidden the fact that I was a REPUBLICAN back then. And yes, by being a Republican, I held stupid-ass beliefs." Kos at DailyKos

Moulitsas is a 2007 inductee into the Northern Star Hall of Fame, an honor bestowed by the alumni association of his college newspaper.^[5]Moulitsas earned two bachelor degrees at Northern Illinois University (1992-1996), where he majored in Philosophy, Journalism, and Political Science. He earned a J.D. at Boston University School of Law (1996-1999).^[6]

In a June 6, 2006 speech to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, Moulitsas stated that he had spent between six months and two years training at the Central Intelligence Agency in Washington, DC. In this speech Kos said began in 2001, before he started DailyKos,Commonwealth Club Audio Tape of Moulitsas interview. and continued until the beginning of his involvement with the Howard Dean presidential campaign (late 2003/early 2004), which would mean that Markos Moulitsas was in training with the US CIA for as much as two years.Commonwealth Club Audio Tape

In a 1993 college essay, Moulitsas opined that gays should not be permitted to serve in the military under any circumstances. Moulitsas said that for non-gay military men, "There is something inherently uncomfortable about it."Sourcewatch.org

[edit]Daily Kos

Main article: Daily Kos

Moulitsas founded Daily Kos in May 2002, and the site quickly rose to prominence. In its first year, Daily Kos received over one million unique visitors.^{[citation needed]}

Moulitsas attended the California State Democratic convention in Sacramento in March, 2003 with Jerome Armstrong of MyDD. According toInstapundit, they may have been the first bloggers to be officially accredited at a political convention.^{[citation needed]} By June 9, 2003, when Moulitsas's consulting firm, Armstrong Zúniga, began working for Howard Dean's presidential campaign, Moulitsas says he chose to work with Howard Dean rather than join the Central Intelligence Agency.^[7][8] Based on the dates he provided in his interview at the Commonwealth Club, he would have been interviewing and training with the CIA for up to two years, during the time when he started DailyKos. Some leftists, progressives and liberals have expressed doubt whether a true progressive would train at the CIA, particularly in light of what has been learned from the torture memos left over from the Bush Administration. During the Commonwealth Club interview, Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga says he believes the CIA is a "liberal institution" whose "heart is in the right place." After reviewing the Commonwealth Club interview, one criticentitled an article, "Daily Kos: CIA Engineered Controlled Opposition?"

[edit]Growth and controversy

( . . . )

Daily Kos has spawned an annual conference. The inaugural YearlyKos was held from June 8 to June 11, 2006, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Guests included Nevada U.S. Senator and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, former Virginia Governor Mark Warner, DNC chairman and 2004 presidential candidate Howard Dean.

In a Washington Post article entitled, "A Diversity of Opinion, if Not Opinionators", WaPost author Jose Antonio Vargas reported that he had seen "a Sea of Middle-Aged White Males" at YearlyKos. The Washington Post writer quoted the organizer of the conference, Gina Cooper, as saying, "I hate using the word 'diversity.'" The reporter further quoted one Latina participant at the 2007 YearlyKos conference as posing the question, "Why is the blogosphere, which is supposed to be more democratic, reinforcing the same white male power structure that exists?" Washington Post

New York Times Features Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA, but Not His CIA Connections

This New York Times article demonstrates that the NYT will help Markos Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA raise money and attempt to increase his influence within the Democratic Party, but without ever mentioning the fact that ZÚÑIGA has acknowledged that he was trained

(for this role?) by the Central Intelligence Agency in Washington, DC.

Apparently, in spite of the background information available in ZÚÑIGA's Wikipedia page, and now at SourceWatch.Org, the New York Times is willing to accept the premise that "liberal bloggers" and those who want to push the Democratic Party to the left are led by someone trained first by the CIA.

A group of liberal bloggers say they are teaming up with organized labor and MoveOn.org to form a political action committee that will seek to push the Democratic Party further to the left.

( . . . )

The new organization is in many ways the liberal equivalent of the Club for Growth, a conservative group that has financed primary challenges against Republicans it deems insufficiently dedicated to tax cuts and small government.

ZÚÑIGA's group is only the equivalent of the Club for Growth if the leaders of the Club for Growth were trained in Cuba for two years months in preparation for their right-wing advocacy, like MAMZ was trained at the CIA.

Is it possible that JIM RUTENBERG prepared this this New York Times article on ZÚÑIGA's activities without ever noticing the 78,000 hits for "CIA" and "Moulitsas" at Google? Did Rutenberg not notice that the very second hit on the search results for "CIA" and "ZÚÑIGA" leads to evidence that Markos C.A. Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA (MAMZ) was trained by the CIA? What does it say about the mainstream media when they ignore discrediting information that so many other people already understand as fundamental to understanding MAMZ background?

If this article is any indication, then the mainstream media will continue to try to present MAMZ to America as a "progressive" and "liberal" in spite of and without ever mentioning his self-admitted connections with and devotion to the Central Intelligence Agency, and his previous advocacy against ALL gay service in the military.

Alright, I admit that I take this as a personal affront. I didn't research and publish the first transcript of MAMZ'speech at the Commonwealth Club so it could be ignored. I didn't go through MAMZ's writings at his college newspaper and find his anti-gay screed in the hopes that the mainstream media would find these novelties uninteresting and unenlightening.

The good news is that before giving any money to MAMZ and his front groups, every voter and person can look at MAMZ's Wiki page or Google him and discover his connections to the CIA, and discover that his family has received at least a million dollars in loan guarantees from the US Government, for some reason.

I just noticed that although MAMZ went by the name Markos C.A. Moulitsas in college, he since has dropped both his middle initials from his name. I wonder why? And why has the article in which he used these middle initials (and called for all gays to be banned from the military) mysteriously disappareared from the archives at his college's student newspaper?

"Kos" and "CIA" Search Finds Over One Million Hits at Google

The Jawa Report says,

Markos "Kos" Moulitsas almost got hired by the CIA.

( . . . )

If he had been hired, I'm sure it would have looked something like this (photograph above).

Since the photograph made me laugh out loud, I just have to share it with readers.

I feel proud that The Truth About Kos Blog has achieved its goal of making it virtually impossible for anyone to quote DailyKos in the blogosphere without pointing out that:

"Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, owner of the DailyKos website, now admits that he spent six months in the employ of the US Central Intelligence Agency in 2001," writes Holland. "In a one-hour interview on June 2, 2006 at the Commonwealth Club, Moulitsas, also known as 'Kos,’ admitted that he was a CIA employee and would have 'no problem working for them’ in the present."--Kurt Nimmo

By researching and publishing information that was not available anywhere else about Markos C.A. Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA (MAMZ), including publishing a transcript of his comments at the Commonwealth Club, the Truth About Kos Blog outed MAMZ, virtually compelled whitosphere bloggers to link to this afrosphere source, and to acknowledge that, even as a minority, Black bloggers have political power. In this case, the information one Black blogger had to share was actually more compelling to white than to Blacks, since Blacks had mostly ignored MAMZ (2% Black participants at DailyKos) while whites had once taken him seriously.

Perhaps most white bloggers don't even know or care that it was a Black man who outed MAMZ as a CIA agent, based on a tip from Stu Piddy. But the outing has become a national collaboration of the Left, because none of us wants to be infiltrated by the CIA as we go about the serious work of progressive politics.

That's why if you Google "Kos" and "CIA" now, you find 1,280,000 hits, and MOST are NOT about Valerie Plame anymore. They're instances of bloggers citing the Truth About Kos Blog and secondary sources to prove that nothing MAMZ and his minions say can have any more credibility than a press release from undercover CIA agents or military employees in Iraq.

There is some unfinished business, however. Newspapers like the Washington Post continue to cite MAMZ without telling readers that he has admitted to spending up to two years time at the CIA, and that he once opposed ALL gay service in the military. These are facts the public needs to know. These are facts that have over a million hits at Google. And these are facts that the mainstream media is ignoring. This means that the mainstream media may NEVER tell the public about even well-known infiltration of progressive groups.

At the same time, with MAMZ's CIA connections reported at Wikipedia, it's very hard for the mainstream media to write glowing "immigrant make good" stories about MAMZ, particularly when Truth About Kos has pointed out that MAMZ is not even an immigrant, but was born in Chicago, into a family that is demonstrably very, very wealthy and very intimately connected to right-wing groups in El Salvador. Just read the links in the sidebar if you haven't already. They'll take you to the Government documents and corporate websites that show that someone in MAMZ's family was also on a representative board of El Salvador's right wing ANEP (National Association of Private Enterprises).

I guess the mainstream media will never tell us about this, even though I personally spoke with a reporter from the Washington Post who subsequently wrote about MAMZ without mentioning this at least very curious and discrediting information within MAMZ's background. It doesn't matter much, though. Any college student with access to Google now knows that MAMZ has to be treated as a CIA agent or asset, because, as TruthOut says in his YouTube videos about MAMZ, "Once CIA, Always CIA."

MaryScott O'Connor's MyLeftWing Still Links to John Edwards' "Campaign to Change America" Site

I note with amusement that the MyLeftWing psuedo progressive whitosphere blog still links to "John Edwards Campaign to Change America" among its list of "POLITICIANS & Supporters". Needless to say, all of the "politicians and supporters" on the list are white men, except for Barack Obama, who only got on the list by being elected President of the United States.

In the run-up to the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primaries, MaryScott O'Connor had a "hard-on" for John Edwards that hasn't even subsided with the knowledge that Edwards is a boldfaced liar whose insistence that he hadn't cheated on his wife could well have cost the Democrats the 2008 presidential election, had we been foolish enough to nominate John Edwards for president.

MaryScott O'Connor still thinks it's worth linking to John Edwards. That shows you how much judgment she has in general. Ultimately, John Edwards "Campaign to Change America" was an expensive effort to change the country from one with a 43-term white male monopoly of the presidency into a country with a 44-term white male monopoly of the presidency. That's change we can do without.

She also lists Al Gore on her list of Politicians and Supporters, although Gore flunked out of divinity school AND law school, after smoking pot and drinking his way to a "C" average during his undergraduate years at Harvard University. These are the politicians MaryScott O'Connor admires, but Secretary of State Hillary Clinton can't get on the list, and neither can any other woman from America or elsewhere.

This is why Dave from New York is really wasting his time arguing with people who stomach this sort of nonsense at MyLeftWing.